🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation may be passed soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," commented the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level amid federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to follow the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, additional countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies take a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

As this global debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and others show that states around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.